Comments on: Inner Workings: The Project Scheduler http://csut017.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/inner-workings-the-project-scheduler/ Exploring the Code of CruiseControl.Net Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:40:54 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Inner Workings: Project Physiology « Automated Coder http://csut017.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/inner-workings-the-project-scheduler/#comment-132 Inner Workings: Project Physiology « Automated Coder Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:30:34 +0000 http://csut017.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/inner-workings-the-project-scheduler/#comment-132 [...] I have covered how a project build is scheduled (read it here). In the previous post I covered how the scheduling mechanism works, how it ties in queues and [...] [...] I have covered how a project build is scheduled (read it here). In the previous post I covered how the scheduling mechanism works, how it ties in queues and [...]

]]> By: Craig Sutherland http://csut017.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/inner-workings-the-project-scheduler/#comment-126 Craig Sutherland Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:03:45 +0000 http://csut017.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/inner-workings-the-project-scheduler/#comment-126 Hi John, That is definitely a doable extension, and one that we are (very) slowly moving towards. Of course, if you want to help out with it, I'd be happy to help you in any way I can :-) Craig Hi John,

That is definitely a doable extension, and one that we are (very) slowly moving towards. Of course, if you want to help out with it, I’d be happy to help you in any way I can :-)

Craig

]]> By: John http://csut017.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/inner-workings-the-project-scheduler/#comment-125 John Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:42:44 +0000 http://csut017.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/inner-workings-the-project-scheduler/#comment-125 Hi Craig, Really enjoy your posts and the amount of detail you go into. From what you have seen do you think this is a possible extension: 1) One server becomes a master and manages a queue (i.e. it receives the requests for a project to start). 2) You can have a project on one or more servers (it just has a different host) e.g. 2 3) When a request comes in it passes to whichever of the two servers has more resources (i.e. distributing the load). Lots of potential issues (keeping the logs, build number etc in sync) but could be useful for busier builds. Just a thought. Have a good weekend. John Hi Craig,

Really enjoy your posts and the amount of detail you go into.

From what you have seen do you think this is a possible extension:

1) One server becomes a master and manages a queue (i.e. it receives the requests for a project to start).

2) You can have a project on one or more servers (it just has a different host) e.g. 2

3) When a request comes in it passes to whichever of the two servers has more resources (i.e. distributing the load).

Lots of potential issues (keeping the logs, build number etc in sync) but could be useful for busier builds.

Just a thought.

Have a good weekend.

John

]]>